2 Comments

Some Thoughts on the Movie Fury

Okay, so I like tanks. I used to build model kits of them but was never all that good at it compared to my friends. I got more glue on my fingers than I did on the model. Sigh. I may try again. Who knows? Maybe age will have improved my skills.

So, what initially grabbed my attention about the movie Fury was a Sherman tank nicknamed “Fury.” This particular Sherman is an upgrade (M4A3E8) from the standard 75mm pop gun on the basic Sherman that was hopelessly outclassed by most of the German tanks, assault guns and anti-guns of the time. The upgraded Sherman featured a long-barreled 76mm gun with a higher velocity round, still outclassed by most German tanks, but at least an improvement.

Fury

Fury

The other attention getter is known as the Bovington (Museum in the UK) Tiger. The Brits captured one of the famous Tiger I’s in North Africa and shipped it home for study. Today it sits at the Bovington Museum and it actually runs-the only one still in existence that does so.

The Bovington Tiger I

The Bovington Tiger I

The producers of Fury were able to “borrow” it for some scenes although most of the action was filmed with a mock-up; the Bovington being to rare to risk any damage.

The movie features a duel between four Shermans including the upgraded Fury and the fearsome Tiger I. The Tiger I was a bit rare but where it appeared any duels were a bit of mismatch since the Tiger’s frontal armor was impossible to penetrate, something the movie illustrates quite well.

Having said all that, the bulk of the movie is not about the tanks; it’s about the crew of a Sherman tank in the closing days of WW2 when the Allied armies were racing across Germany.

The movie was about the crew of Fury.

The movie was about the crew of Fury.

The star of the movie is Brad Pitt who does what I think is a very credible job as “Wardaddy”. Pitt is an Sgt. E7 to use modern lingo and his mission is to keep his crew alive. The crew is a mixed bunch featuring a Bible quoter, a Mexican-American and an a loader who comes across as one fry shy short of a happy meal. The group has been together since the North African Campaign and despite their considerable differences these guys love each other and watch each other’s backs and in that the movie has a A Band of Brothers feel to it.  The language is pure military. I recall from my own short time in the Army an amazing variety of forms and uses for the “F” word and that is the case in Fury.

The cement in the story is the new guy named Norman who is the replacement assistant driver because the last one had just been killed. Norman looks to be about eighteen and although I question the line where he says he only had eight weeks of basic training I was not surprised that the Army was cutting short training programs for the combat arms at that stage of the war. The attrition rate in the infantry was atrocious and I doubt it was better for tank crews.

Norman is totally unprepared for the horrors that lay ahead of him. One early scene is compelling. Just before Norman arrives to tell Wardaddy he is the new guy you see a bulldozer pushing mangled German bodies into a mass grave. It’s like no one notices what should be a shock unless you see it everyday, which they probably did.

Wardaddy doesn’t want Norman but he’s stuck with him. Norman’s initial reception from the rest of the crew seems cool and even cruel. Wardaddy tells Norman not to get close to anyone a veiled reference to the attrition rate and the hurt of losing a close buddy.

Shortly after Norman arrives they get another mission and Fury is the second tank in a column of Shermans traveling up a road. Norman spies an armed German kid (teen-Hitler Jugend) through the brush and does not fire the hull MG because the target is a kid. Seconds later another German kid with a Panzerfaust (early RPG) lights up the lead Sherman and Norman watches in horror as a burning crewman shoots himself in the head rather than burn to death!

The German kids are quickly dealt with by the rest of the Shermans.

I thought there was a good juxtaposition going on with the theme of the German kids. On one hand you saw German kids hung by the Nazi’s because they would not fight or deserted and on the other you saw fanatical Hitler Jugend youth quite willing to die for what obviously was at that point a lost cause.

Wardaddy is rightly furious with Norman for not shooting and Norman has to recognize what an armed Hitler Jugend with a Panzerfaust can do.

They reach the mission area and have to clean out some German infantry and anti-guns as they support a pin downed rifle company.

The Shermans supporting the rifle company quickly make short work of the German resistance. What follows is one of the more shocking scenes in the movie imo.

The American infantry capture what appears to be an older German soldier who is not SS. By that stage of the war none of the western allies were in the mood to take SS prisoners-a fact hammered home a bit later in the movie. The average combat soldier had correctly made the assessment that the SS were ideological fanatics (think ISIS) and at that stage of the war the major obstacle to ending the war and the reason for a lot of unnecessary blood shed are the SS holdouts.

What is shocking about the above scene is that the older German is not SS. He looks to be in his 40s and he is pleading for his life trying to show the GI’s pictures of his family while he begs them not to shoot him. The American infantry could care less and some are mocking the poor soul. The scene is gripping because you expect the “good guys” to just take him prisoner despite the mocking and indifference to his begging.

Wardaddy intervenes but it’s not to save the German soldier as you tend to expect. Wardaddy grabs Norman and seeks to force Norman to shoot the soldier in the back while the rest of Americans look on seemingly understanding the lesson being played out.

Norman’s sensibilities are shocked to the maximum and he fights Wardaddy the best he can. The other Americans look on in indifference with understanding because Norman could not shoot the German kid with the rifle. Wardaddy is teaching Norman to hate not for hate’s sake but to potentially save his life and the lives of Wardaddy’s precious crew.

I hated the scene and felt like Norman whose morals are shocked to the core by the execution of a helpless prisoner. Wardaddy summed it up well when he said, ideals are peaceful and history is violent.

The “lesson” has its desired effect as they occupy a German town. German soldiers run on fire from a building and Norman uses the bow MG to cut them down while other Americans tell him he should have let them burn. Hate. Pure Hate.

The scene reminded me of Rick Atkinson’s, An Army at Dawn, the first in Atkinson’s trilogy of America’s Army on the western front during WW2.

In An Army at Dawn Atkinson makes reference to the fact that America’s citizen soldiers had to learn to hate. They had to learn to view the German soldiers they faced not as human beings who were in many ways similar to the themselves but as hated obstacles in the way of ending the war. The more you kill, the quicker you get to go home saving the lives of your fellow soldiers in the process. It’s a hard lesson in Atkinson’s book and it’s hard lesson in the movie.

Wardaddy commends Norman after he machine guns the Germans on fire and you are not sure if he approved of the mercy involved or if it was just the fact Norman could do it for whatever the motive (remember the previous scene when the American on fire kills himself). It’s another example of blurred motives. From that point on Wardaddy and Norman’s relationship improves.

Those were the kind of scenes that gripped me. The scenes compared with the intensity of Saving Pvt. Ryan as they dealt with the raw emotion of war and the not so easy boundaries between right and wrong, justice and murder.

The tanks in my opinion were secondary to the story of men who were sick of war and who had to make split second decisions that were not always “clean”.

My only real complaint about the movie was the ending where a disabled Fury and her crew take on considerable odds against the hated SS. Frankly, the Germans look stupid and whatever else you might say about German soldiers they were not stupid. But honestly, it’s a minor complaint and otherwise it’s a good movie ranking up there with Band of Brothers and Saving Pvt. Ryan. Just don’t be shocked by the language because that is how soldiers talk and don’t be shocked by the carnage because that’s what soldiers see.

 

4 Comments

Cpl. Herb Lehnen, 101st AB, 327th Glider Inf. From Normandy to Bergstaden

I have a friend who lost touch with her father due to a divorce when she was about five-years-old. Much later in life she connected with cousins who were able to tell her about her biological father.

As it turns out my friend’s father was a member of the 101st Airborne Division, 327th Glider Infantry from 1943 to the end of the war. He and his unit saw major action including Normandy, Market Garden and Bastogne. His name was Cpl. Herb Lehnen and he wrote numerous letters from the front to various members of his family and friends. One of my friend’s cousins is in possession of 80+ of these letters and my friend gave me the two she had. She gave me permission to reproduce them on my history blog.

The famous Screaming Eagle of the 101st AB Div.

The famous Screaming Eagle of the 101st AB Div.

The first one is dated June 26th, 1944 and was written when Herb’s unit was engaged in the Carentan Peninsula.

Background to where the 327th was and what it was doing around the time of writing

Normandy – D-Day

In June 1944, the decision to drop both the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions simultaneously into Normandy reduced the number of available aircraft to tow the gliders for a glider assault.  The 327th Glider Infantry Regiment was ordered to land across Utah Beach with the 4th Infantry Division on D-Day.  Its mission was to move to Carentan to cut off the fleeing Germans.  Although casualties were high, the mission was accomplished and the regiment moved back to England to prepare for its next mission. http://www.ww2-airborne.us/units/327/327.html

Although ostensibly the 327th Glider Infantry Regiment during World War II was a part of the 101st Airborne Division, the majority of this unit landed by sea on Utah Beach the afternoon of D-Day +1, 7 June 1944, due to a shortage of glider tow planes. Some elements did reach shore on 6 June, but due to rough seas, beach traffic, and the fact that the paratroopers of the 101st had already achieved many objectives, the landing was delayed. The 327th suffered a few casualties going ashore by enemy fire and were strafed by enemy aircraft. Near Ste. Come DuMont (southeast of the village), the 327th was camped right next to German paratroopers, separated by thick hedgerows. German speaking soldiers in the 327th engaged in taunting the enemy. The 327th took several casualties by enemy mortars. By 8 June, the 327th had entered the front line, largely in reserve of the 506th until crossing the Douve River near Carentan. First and Second Battalions guarded Utah Beachhead’s left flank northeast of Carentan. Company C was hit hard by friendly fire mortars while crossing the Douve. Official findings blamed enemy mines. Company B also suffered casualties in the incident.

The 327th suffered heavy casualties while advancing on Carentan via what is now the city Marina from a northeast direction and other casualties approaching Carentan from the east. G Company led the attack on the west bank of the marina canal. A Company of the attached 401 was on the east bank of the canal. Concealed German machine guns and mortars inflicted the most casualties. Chaplain Gordon Cosby earned a Silver Star for bravery in the face of the enemy for assisting wounded glider men in front of heavily armed German soldiers. The 327th played a pivotal role with the 501st and 506th of the 101st in taking Carentan. The 327th marched through the town and East to be possibly the first unit of the Utah Beachhead to link up with the Omaha Beachhead around the four-villages area of le Fourchette, le Mesnil, le Rocher and Cotz. It was then directed South between the bulk of the 101st and the 75th Infantry Division of the Omaha Beachhead. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/327th_Infantry_Regiment_(United_States)

Battle of Carentan  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Carentan

It is an honor for me to reproduce Herb’s letter. I hope it’s a tribute to all the men and women who served our country during WW2. Here’s the letter dated June 28th, 1944. My commentary is in italics:

Dear Eddie,

 Eddie is Herb’s brother and in the Army, but did his  service stateside. Blanks are words I could not make out from the copy.

I sure was ______ glad to receive your two swell long air mail letters, also Eddie. I’m glad you had a swell time on your last furlough home. I’ll try to answer your swell letter when I have a few hours of spare time.

I found the use of the word “swell” to be common in Herb’s two letters. It’s a word seldom used now but it meant “great” and was American slang at the time.

Well, Eddie, the great invasion [Normandy Invasion, June 6th, 1944] but I’ll never forget the great ______ and adventures I had, since we hit France. Yes, Eddie our airborne division did a great job which was plenty tough and really rugged. I would like to tell you all about our thrills but I can’t because of the dam censor! However, I suppose you read all about it in the papers. There some Germans ______dam good fighters, but we are better. Eddie, I wish you could see my fox hole it’s really a ______ (peach?) about six feet deep and on top I have it covered with slits for protection from the dam German 88mm guns which is really wicked. I don’t mind machine gun fire or rifle fire but that dam 88mm gun is the one that is really tough,

 The Germans referred to here were German paratroopers of the 6th FJR (von der Heydte) and soldiers from a SS Panzer Grenadier Division and as such were elite troops. Herb must have been sensitive to what was acceptable for him to write as the letter does not have anything blocked out by a sensor. I found it humorous that he referred to the censor as the “dam censor.”

I have lots of German ______ some coins, also some of their ______ which the Germans use every once in a while. I could have had lots of German guns; but Eddie, its to much extra stuff to carry. As it is I carry my sub machine gun, lots of bullets and my trench knife always on my side-you have to travel real light.

Herb was a corporal and the standard issue to para NCOs would have been the Thompson submachine gun.

Two typical 101st AB troopers and one is a corporal like Herb.

Two typical 101st AB troopers and one is a corporal like Herb.

Well known pic of some 101st troopers with a captured Nazi flag.  Even from this picture it can be seen they had a lot to carry.

Well known pic of some 101st troopers with a captured Nazi flag. Even from this picture it can be seen they had a lot to carry.

Eddie, its plenty tough and rugged here, very ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ for Germans, however we have things under control now. (I believe he is making reference to the difficult terrain around Carentan that favored the Germans who were defending.) Now, at night Eddie, we slept in our fox hole with our guns always at our sides and our trench knives right by our head just in case a German gets to close.

The French people always bring us plenty of apple cider to drink! Also they treat us pretty good. I haven’t seen a good looking French girl yet. I can’t figure out where they are at.

Food and girls, common concerns for most GI’s. Most of the girls would probably be in hiding safe from German or American soldiers is my guess.

Yes, Eddie, your right the Army surely does things which are really stupid-you’ll never use ( 1/2 fraction here?) of that stuff in combat.

Yeah, cause you have to lug it around.

Eddie, just use your head, don’t work to hard and if its possible try like hell to get reclassified because your eyes are in no shape for a combat outfit.

Very interesting line imo. Herb is obviously very concerned about his brother and not in the least resentful that he is in combat and his brother is not.

I hope and pray that you will never leave the states. I’m sure we’ll have this war in Europe over with pretty darn soon.

Many GI’s thought the war would be over by Christmas, 1944.

Eddie, just about all the guys are dam glad they are married, so don’t let the dam war stop you from getting married. I’ll be around good old Wisconsin by Christmas time then Eddie we’ll really celebrate the good old days.

Another interesting insight into the mindset of these combat soldiers. Most are happy to be married. They might be thinking about French girls and food but thoughts of home and hearth is want they really want.

Judging from the other letter I’ve seen Herb did not make it home for Christmas. He was in the Battle of the Bulge at the time. The 327th earned an impressive citation for their work there.

Thanks a million, Eddie, for getting the gift for ______ for me. I don’t ______ ______ I’ll ______ repay you  for all that you have done for me. Eddie, I have my bonus money made all ready-you have $300.00 for being ______ a certain length of time.

Well Eddie, I’m giving every cent of that to your ______ as gift. Your tops with me Eddie, no one can compare with you-just take good care of yourself and don’t worry because everything will turn out ok.

$300.00 in 1944 was not small change. Herb is quite a guy judging from this letter. I am unsure what the bonus was for since I think the draft was for the duration. Perhaps he had to re-enlist as a para and that’s what the bonus was for.

Oh! I wrote those letters home to the folks last week. I’ll write you whenever possible, so please don’t worry.

We’ll meet again and dam soon-you can bet on that Eddie, I’m looking forward to out meeting.

As I said, like most soldiers of all nations they just want to finish the war and go home.

God bless you and always keep you in good health. Hello to Irene for me. Take good care of yourself Eddie and try like hell to get reclassified, I wish you ______ ______ ______ success always.

Your brother,

Herbie

 

 

 

Leave a comment

War in UpState New York 1777

Butler's Rangers. The Rangers and their Iroquois allies attacked the militia from the flanks in the ambush.

Butler’s Rangers. The Rangers and their Iroquois allies attacked the militia from the flanks in the ambush.

Upstate New York, August, 1777 “Gentleman” Johnny Burgoyne is leading a British Army from Canada in an invasion of New York during the American War of Independence. His goal would be Albany.

By securing upstate New York  the British hoped to take the steam out of the American War for Independence by 1777-78 when the British Army in New York City would move to capture Philadelphia. New York was a tempting target with approximately 33% of the population favoring the British while another 33% favored the rebels and another third just wanting to get on with their lives.

The campaign which ultimately failed became known as the Saratoga Campaign. The battles fought in the campaign are part of upstate New York’s colonial past and key aspects of United States history given their consequences.

As part of Burgoyne’s strategy he sent a British Lt. Colonel by the name of Barry St. Leger on a diversion to take the American fort named Fort Stanwix.

The nucleus of St. Leger’s force was a company of British Regulars, two Regiments of Loyalists (Butler’s Rangers and The Royal Regiment of New York), a company of Germans from Hesse-Hanau who were rifle armed. To this force approximately 450 Native Americans were enlisted. Predominate among them were Mohawks and Senecas.

Lefferts Print http://www.srcalifornia.com/uniforms/p42.htm

The Royal Regiment of New York or Johnson’s Royal Greens. Many residents of New York favored the Crown in 1777. Lefferts Print http://www.srcalifornia.com/uniforms/p42.htm

The use of native Americans by the British was controversial even in British circles. The reason it was controversial is that the native warriors were impossible to control; something the French found out in the preceding French and Indian War.

The Indians fought primarily to take captives and to ransom them. They also fought for the spoils of war which meant looting. Many a Tory (Loyalist) family suffered from St. Leger’s Indians since the Indians made little distinction between Loyalist and Patriot. As far as the Indians were concerned both were Americans they had recently been at war with and thus fair game.

The Indians were also notorious for atrocities. To fall into their hands often could and would mean a long and painful death.

The British had a certain reluctance to use the Indians but use them they did as a terror weapon and thus using every means possible means to bring the rebels back to the crown.

When the St. Leger’s forces reached Fort Stanwix they issued an ultimatum to the garrison. Surrender now and we will guarantee your safety from the Indians but if we have to storm the fort there will be no such guarantee.

The Americans behind the walls of Fort Stanwix were no strangers to frontier warfare and knew full well that if they surrendered the well-meaning British officers would have little control over the Indians and even among the loyalists many of whom had suffered by the hands of the rebels. War in upstate New York often had the dimensions of vicious civil war.

These facts accounted for the Americans reluctance to surrender and they so replied  “no thanks, we will take our chances behind these walls. Besides, if your Indians commit atrocities our blood will be on your hands and not ours.”

It was a fitting reply that acknowledged the British has little control over their “terror weapon.”

The killing of Jane McCrea. The murder of Ms. McCrea galvanized the patriot militia to oppose St. Leger. The irony was that Ms. McCrea was engaged to a Loyalist officer serving with Burgoyne.

The killing of Jane McCrea. The murder of Ms. McCrea galvanized the patriot militia to oppose St. Leger. The irony was that Ms. McCrea was engaged to a Loyalist officer serving with Burgoyne.

Marching to the relief of Fort Stanwix were four battalions of New York militia numbering 800 men under the leadership of General Nicholas Herkimer.

St. Leger who knew full well the militia was on its way to relieve Fort Stanwix consulted with his Loyalists and decided that they would attempt to ambush the militia column before it got to the fort. Their strategy was sound for if the militia made it to the fort the British forces would be greatly outnumbered especially so because the Indians were nearly useless in a stand up fight.

Leaving a small force to continue the siege of the fort St. Leger sent the bulk of his forces to ambush the militia column.

Nicholas Herkimer, the militia general, was popular with his men but a poor General.  He made a cardinal mistake in the march to relief Stanwix-he failed to scout his route adequately.

This is remarkable given the fact Herkimer was aware that the opposing British force was dominated by Indians (and Butler’s Rangers) who were the masters of the ambush and of scouting. Herkimer did have some woodsmen among his militia as well as a few Oneida scouts and perhaps they failed to pick up on the ambush.

Whatever the case Herkimer marched his men in a dense column through a forest path. The ambushing Indians along with Butler’s Rangers took up flanking positions while the Royal Regiment of New York blocked the road. It was a classic ambush set up that worked out as planned.

The Royal Greens (the other name for the Royal Regiment of New York) began the battle with a ploy. The Greens knew that a certain Massachusetts Continental Regiment was dressed primarily in whitish hunting shirts. The Greens reversed their coats to show the white lining. When the militia came into view they would think it was the Massachusetts Regiment coming down from Stanwix to link up.

New York militia gather around their wounded General at the Battle of Oriskany.http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/01/reflections-on-the-american-revolution-the-militia/

New York militia gather around their wounded General at the Battle of Oriskany.http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/01/reflections-on-the-american-revolution-the-militia/

That was exactly what the lead company of militia thought. They were rudely brought into reality by the Greens first volley which cut down most of the lead company before they could respond to their error.

The volley signaled the attack and in the resulting battle the militia lost 50% of the entire force including General Herkimer making it one of the most bloody battles in the American War of Independence.

The militia recovered from the initial shock and began to give a good account of themselves. They were no doubt motivated by the fact they were surrounded and that to give up would mean cruel torture at the hands of St. Leger’s Indians.

After much vicious close quarter fighting the Indians began to lose interest especially as a good percentage of their leaders had been killed by the desperate militia. The Indians began to melt away or merely hold their positions leaving the Greens and Rangers to press the attack. By that time those units were exhausted and a terrible thunder-storm broke out that effectively ended the engagement with Herkimer’s soldiers retreating. General Herkimer would later die of his wounds.

St. Leger’s force suffered 15% casualties mostly among the Indians while Herkimer’s command lost 50% meaning that virtually every family in the county lost a father, son, uncle or other relative in what became known as the Battle of Oriskany.

Although Herkimer failed to relieve Stanwix it turned out it did not matter. While St. Leger moved to confront Herkimer the garrison of Stanwix sortied from the fort dispersing the few regulars left. The Americans took the camp and looted it thoroughly with the Indians losing the most. When they returned from the battle and found their camp looted they became even more disillusioned and began their long march back to Canada. This left St. Leger to small a force to continue the siege and he withdrew as well.

The Battle of Oriskany is unique in that it was fought exclusively by Americans on both sides. The only exceptions were the British officers with St. Leger.

For an excellent account I recommend Richard Berleth’s, Bloody Mohawk-the French and Indian War & American Revolution on New York’s Frontier.

 

 

 

1 Comment

The Capture of the USS President 15 January 1815

Bruce:

Superb blog in general but a great article on a War of 1812 naval battle.

Originally posted on War and Security:

The United Kingdom and United States of America agreed terms to end the War of 1812 on 24 December 1814. They were ratified by the UK government three days later, but the slow speed of communications from Europe to America meant that fighting continued until well into February.

The American frigate USS President (44 guns), the sloops USS Hornet and Peacock and the schooner USS Tom Bowlinewere in New York at the start of 1815. Commodore Stephen Decatur, captain of the President, intended to break out in order to raid British shipping. The harbour was large, but difficult to enter and leave in bad weather because of the many sand banks between Coney Island and Sandy Hook.[1]

On 13 January the port was blockaded by the razee (a 74 gun ship of the line cut down to be a heavy frigate), HMS Majestic(58) and the…

View original 1,798 more words

Leave a comment

2014 in reviews

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2014 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

The concert hall at the Sydney Opera House holds 2,700 people. This blog was viewed about 46,000 times in 2014. If it were a concert at Sydney Opera House, it would take about 17 sold-out performances for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.

Leave a comment

I’ll be home for Christmas . . .

Bruce:

Interesting back story to a well known Christmas song.

Originally posted on The Casemate Blog:

We at Casemate wish everyone the nicest holiday season. People are reconnecting with family now, taking long-overdue days off, and in general seeking to regenerate in pleasant circumstances for the next year to come.

While we all take a brief respite, nevertheless, a particular song has been going on in our heads that still resonates through the decades, and as a military history publisher it may be appropriate for us here to describe its context.

“I’ll Be Home for Christmas” was written by the songwriting team of Gannon and Kent, with credit to Buck Ram for its original lyrics. The song was recorded by Bing Crosby in 1943, right in the middle of World War II, just as America had flung literally millions of its men across its oceans—to Europe and the Pacific—to try to retrieve Western values against aggressive dictators who sought power through force rather than the universal…

View original 549 more words

2 Comments

Killing Patton_Book Review

Killing Patton-The Strange Death of World War IIs Most Audacious General, by Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard. Henry Holt and Company, Copyright 2014. 350 pages

I would consider myself an occasional viewer of Bill O’Reilly on Fox. I can’t make up my mind as to whether I like him or not.

I usually agree with his daily memo and enjoy the show when Miller is on but on other occasions I find O’Reilly annoying especially when he talks over Megyn Kelly who is way, way smarter than he.

O’Reilly always loses me when he talks “expertly” on religion often just mouthing a half-baked Roman Catholic theology that seems to disparage anyone who takes the Bible seriously or sees it differently than he does.

For that reason I skipped O’Reilly’s best-selling Killing Jesus although it would be a subject I’d otherwise have an interest in.

When O’Reilly wrote Killing Lincoln I was a bit more interested since I thought he would be better at American History than he would be talking anything theological. Never-the-less, I skipped Killing Lincoln (and Killing Kennedy) as well.

When Killing Patton came out I admit to being intrigued.

Old Blood and Guts George Patton

Old Blood and Guts George Patton

My father was a Military Policeman stationed in Cologne, Germany at the time Patton had his fatal “accident.”

As a child dad told me that all the military police in his unit, including officers doubted that it was a car accident that did the famous general in. According to my dad speculation ranged from the Werewolves (post-war Nazi Hitler Youth who were suppose to create havoc among the occupying allies) to the Russians!

No doubt much of what was said was rumor and GI gossip yet these were Military Police whose intuition and speculation could be spot on despite the official reporting of what happened.

Patton’s death has always been shrouded with a degree of mystery and as I read Killing Patton (a gift from wife as I recovered from a major surgery) my hopes were that the authors had uncovered some new evidence or smoking gun that could put the matter to rest.

At least 50% of the book is given to documenting Patton’s well-known battlefield exploits especially as he leads his Third Army across France and into Germany in a relentless campaign that deserves more attention that it usually receives.

The book also covers Patton’s personal side, the slapping of two soldiers who would now be diagnosed PTSD, his big mouth that famously gets him in trouble with Eisenhower, how he irritates Monty and dislikes the Russians. Patton is militarily brilliant, colorful, pompous, a believer in reincarnation and to his superiors a pain in the hind quarters.

Personally, I think the movie Patton starring George C. Scott was spot on in portraying the man and Killing Patton confirms the portrayal.

George C, Scott in the 1970 release of Patton

George C, Scott in the 1970 release of Patton

The last half of the book was a bit more interesting to me as it built upon the idea that the car accident which took Patton’s life was no accident.

O’Reilly and Martin Dugard (co-author) trace the possibilities of who might want Patton dead based on the scant available evidence, much of which has mysteriously disappeared over the years. Where the trail leads is quite interesting and in the interest of not giving a spoiler I won’t let on to where the finger ends up pointing.

O’Reilly and Dugard claim that with each of their books they are not conspiracy nuts. Their method is to stick with the known facts and evidence and let the reader draw their own conclusions. I believe they have achieved that goal in Killing Patton.

The authors also do a nice job of telling the reader of some of the larger than life characters that were Patton’s superiors, peers and contemporizes.

Eisenhower looms large which is not surprising. Eisenhower’s war-time affair with his secretary Kay Summersby receives much attention as does Patton’s affair with Jean Gordon which nearly cost him his marriage with his beloved Beatrice. In fact the affairs of famous men seem to be a given.

When President Truman attends the Potsdam Conference he asked if he wants either women or wine or both. Truman is horrified and tells the officer who made the offer to never ever suggest such a thing again. That an officer would naturally assume Truman would be interested says something about what was considered normal behavior for the high-ranking. It also says something about Truman’s integrity.

Patton turns out to be right about the Russians and right about not trusting them-a fact Rooselvelt nor Eisenhower didn’t want to grasp or care. Had Patton had his way the Third Army would have liberated Berlin and the geographical lines of the Cold War would have been drawn very differently.

But Patton did not get his way and while he was responsible for getting himself into much trouble one has to wonder if the American High Command was indeed that naïve regarding Stalin and the Russians and simply put Patton away because it was politically expedient to do so.

After the war a large military parade was held in Berlin by the victors. George Patton was on the stand next to Marshall Zhukov, Hero of the Soviet Union and the Soviet General most responsible for defeating the Germans in the east.

A unit of ISIII’s (Soviet heavy tank, IS stands for JS or Joseph Stalin) rolls by. Zhukov remarks to Patton that the heavy tank can fire seven miles. Unflustered Patton replies that any member of his Third Army that opened fire on an enemy tank at more than 700 yards would be court-martialed for cowardice. Zhukov has no response.

That was George Patton, old Blood and Guts, either loved or hated, he was a warrior.

The M60 Patton Tank was replaced my the M1 Abrams tank. Abrahams served under Patton in the Third Army.

The M60 Patton Tank was replaced my the M1 Abrams tank. Abrahams served under Patton in the Third Army.

 

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 699 other followers